Saturday, December 4, 2010

Julian Assang is fighting against the truth of 9/11. What is Wiki?

Whatever the truth is about Wikileaks the
facts will eventually make it clear if it is

I have said before that I was 100% behind
Wikileaks when it released the video 'Collateral
Murder', and the other documents. But, now I come
firmly down on the side of those who suspect and
believe that Wikileaks is an operation run by an
intelligence agency like the CIA, or Mossad, or more.

The leaks and all the information stemming from them
make them appear to be the ultimate whistleblowers. A
source of truth. And, Julian Assange the ultimate 'White
Knight' exposing evil and corruption.

But, think about this-when both the CIA and KGB were
trying to infiltrate each other's agency they had many

One was to pay for information from someone within
the agency willing to do so for cash, or whatever.

Secondly, they could Blackmail someone through sex
as the KGB did often.

They could also place a 'mole' within the agency.
A 'mole' is say, someone within the CIA who works, for
Russia, as did Aldrich Ames, or Mossad (Jonathan Pollard)
who worked for both the CIA and the US Navy.

By the way, the Russians and Mossad were/are much more
effective at infiltrating American intelligence than the
other way around.

But, when it comes to war governments need first and
foremost propaganda, and also disinformation, and disruption
of anti-war movements, and to sow distrust among groups
opposed to their policies.

Anyone who is shocked at the suggestion that Wikileaks could
be part of such a campaign might well read about

The Office of Strategic Influence (OSI). Sourcewatch says this

it 'was "established shortly after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks,
(Oct. 30, 2001!!!) a response to concerns in the administration that
the United States was losing public support overseas for its war on
terrorism, particularly in Islamic countries." public relations campaigns.'


'OSI, headed by Air Force Brig. Gen. Simon P. Worden, began "circulating
classified proposals calling for aggressive campaigns that use[d] not only
the foreign media and the Internet, but also covert operations." Worden
envisioned "a broad mission ranging from 'black' campaigns that use[d]
disinformation and other covert activities to 'white' public affairs that
rely on truthful news releases," according to Pentagon officials. "'It goes
from the blackest of black programs to the whitest of white,' a senior
Pentagon official said." [3]

"rely on truthful news releases." like Wikileaks?

The OSI was allegedly going to shut down in 2002 according to
the BBC in it's online news of Tues, 26 Feb, 2002.
'US closes 'disinformation' unit'

As early as 2001 the US felt the need to manipulate what was
told to it's own, and other peoples, especially Muslim peoples.
But, when you're being bombed disinformation doesn't work
quite well.

Some question to ask oneself is why did the Pentagon and
Bush administration feel the need for a disinformation campaign
October 2001?

Secondly, when they closed it due to heavy criticism do you think
that that was the end of it?

I doubt it. They may have closed it down in name only, or done so
while they came up with a new one. But one thing is for sure; they
couldn't make it public.

Consider this quote by former Director of the CIA:
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance
in the major media."

By the way, Colby was murdered by the CIA for revealing what some
former Directors considered too much truth during a Congressional
investigation. One former Director (DCIA) Richard M. Helms 1966–73
called Colby a 'traitor.'

So, there are some givens. First is that the US felt as early
as 2001 that they could not conduct these wars without some sort of
lying, disinformation, managing the media campaigns et al. The big
point is to manage what is being put out, and above all to make it
seem like the source is legitimate.

Also, to confuse, discredit, and through all of these things push
your-the administrations-own propaganda and agenda through media

As for Wikileaks it has already turned like-minded people, that is
people opposed to these wars of aggressions against each other.

But, what will help to discern what Wikileaks is truely about will
be what Julian Assange, or any of their leaders say, or don't say, that
is what topics they avoid. Also, what they do, and what they don't do.

So far, Wikileaks has dumped loads of data onto the mainstream media
and let them sort it out and see what is appropriate to publish. That
is the same organs like the New York Times, a propaganda vehicle for the
war party.

What they don't do is to demand:
--the resignations of the guilty and exposed.
-- war crimes investigations.
--an immediate end to the war.

If Wikileaks can expose so many other things that will
most likely never, ever get prosecuted, then why does Assange
avoid the GREATEST LIE: that 9/11 was a conspiracy, and inside job
as more and more American military officers are recognizing.

The cover-up of 9/11 is the greatest evil in one sense, because 9/11
was used as the pretext for an aggressive foreign policy by the US.

On 9/11 the US air defenses were deliberately neutralized to prevent
command units and fighter jets from responding to hijacking of planes
as they did dozens upon dozens of times in the years before.

I do not believe that any civilian airplane hit the WTC, or
the Pentagon. they were drones most likely.

And, while Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice et al said that there was no way
that they could have imagined that someone would hijack planes and fly
them into buildings. Their intelligence reports said that it would happen.

But the worst is that while they said those things after 9/11...on
that day there were four secret military operations conducted
with the scenario of planes being hijacked and crashed into buildings.

Yet post 9/11 the political and military leaders said that no one could
have imagined that planes would be hijacked for that purpose.

NORTHERN VIGILANCE took place on 9/11
'The morning of 9/11 began with multiple training exercises of war
games and terror drills which Cheney, as mandated by the president,
was placed in charge of managing.

'War games & terror drills included live-fly exercises with military
aircraft posing as hijacked aircraft over the United States, as well
as simulated exercises that placed "false blips" (radar injects indicating
virtual planes) on FAA radar screens. One exercise titled NORTHERN VIGILANCE
pulled Air Force fighters up into Canada simulating a Russian air attack, so
there were very few fighters remaining on the east coast to respond. All of
this paralyzed Air Force response ensuring that fighter jocks couldn't
stop 9/11.

They had sent fighter jets from the East Coast to Canada before 9/11!!!

Operation 'VIGILANT WARRIOR' had sent military fighter jets from the
east coast to Alaska!!!

Operation VIGILANT GUARDIAN...', simulated hijacked planes'

Operation NORTHERN GUARDIAN 'involved deployment of aircraft
from Langley Air Force Base(Maryland) to Iceland.

All of these exercises were planned several months before 9/11.
They took fighter jets and sent them to Canadaq, Iceland, Alaska et al,
anywhere, but where the attacks of 9/11 would occur.

The cover-up of what actually happened on 9/11 was a grave crime...

So, my question to all who support Wikileaks despite Julian Assange
saying that he is annoyed with the 9/11 truth movement is this: don't
you find that a bit odd?

Secondly, whose interest does it serve?

It serves the interests of the criminals who planned, and
conducted 9/11, and then used it as a pretext to invade Afghanistan
and Iraq.


DICK CHENEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tuesday, 18 September, 2001, 11:27 GMT 12:27 UK

Oh, by the way the BBC reported this US 'planned attack on Taleban'
by mid July 2001!


  1. If Assange had exposed the 9/11 govt lie - he'd be dead - and not merely in jail. It's dangerous out there.

  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

  3. I don't know what to make of this comment. It is true, but I don't know if it is from a honest person making an honest observation,...or

    if it's from some dark force of the government, cia whatever.

    If the latter, then I have been threatened this way before, and it has not detered me. I have survived the night terror of the A Shau valley with sappers less than 50 feet away, and my share of snipers trying to kill this radioman, and booby traps and more.

    So, I believe this
    "And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell," MAT 10:28.

    And, what helped me survive those places and others after was this, which I wore as my armour:

    "Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil; For you are with me; Your rod and Your staff, they comfort me." Psalm 23:4

    But, a hero of my childhood, Nathan Hale had this to say whilst the British put the noose around his neck:
    "I only regret that I have but one life to give for my country."

    And, tis a better way, than to ignore truth for fear of bodily harm.

    And Thomas Paine said:
    “My country is the world, and my religion is to do good.” That is the way that I have felt since I returned from Vietnam.

    I truely believe in this statment:
    "The hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who remain neutral in times of great moral conflict."
    Martin Luther King, Jr.

    It is possible that I may not die a peaceful death, but that is not a worry. what I only have to fear is that when I face Allah-God that I can do so with no shame for doing nothing in a time of great moral crisis

  4. There is alot of us out here just looking for a reason to protest in any way we can. Maybe with this "excuse" for his arrest we'll get angry enough to show our support for information any way we can get it. I know Im tired of sitting on the "see how it plays out" fence. Julian Assange has my support.

  5. Hello anon, i think i know you from twitter,.a guess. it was this comment of yours 'It's dangerous out there.' that made me wonder if i was being threatened again.
    I sometimes think that even twitter/faceboof-i don't use it- et al serves the intelligence community, military industrial bank complex a purpose. in the 1970s we didn't have all these things...and people dug for facts, and were out in the street much, much more...and that is the way to bring true change.

    As for Im tired of sitting on the "see how it plays out" fence...i would not tell you what to do, or think, but suggest reading ex intell professionsals assessment of Wiki.
    Peace Be Upon You

  6. I HEARD 9/11 is a conspiracy.I would really appreciate if you WRIT ANYTHING on your blog abt this.Does wiki-leaks survive with Julie assenge and do you think all the charges against him are true??my point of view is-i dnt think so coz America dnt want any of its war crimes committed in Iraq and Afghanistan to be exposed...
    deepak from Bangalore/India

  7. Hello Deepak, as for 9/11 I can only suggest that you research for yourself, and seek the truth. this one may be a good start:
    but the pictures of the building imploding are a telling sign. Building No. 7 did not have any airplane fly into it, and yet it came down just like WTC 1 and 2.

  8. There are a lot of unanswered questions APPPROX 200 re: 9/11 such as why was so much content missing from the final report? As for Assange he did not receive any documents until well after the event so dont expect to much to come out about it. He is a genuine person who believes that the people should know who's pulling the wool over their eyes. We should question what the hell is going on in our name, do you honestly feel that the germans knew what hitler was doing in their names. ha! ha! ask Joeseph Goebels hitlers expert on Propaganda.

  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

  10. Right From Jump Street said...

    Hello friend, yes There are many unanswered questions about 9/11, and not just what is 'missing from the final report?'

    A big one is the destruction of the evidence.
    See what 'Architects And Engineers For 9/11 Truth' have to say. It was literally impossible for a plane to melt steel beams as the towers impolded. What was left was melted down immediately, cut and shipped to China as scrap metal.

    In any criminal investigation preservation of all evidence is most important. The US government had it destroyed. Why?

    About Assange not receiving documents 'until well after the event so dont expect to much to come out about it.' Assange is part of the coverup! He denies what the essence of 9/11 was;a 'False flag' attack. An inside job.

    Ask yourself. Do you believe the official version? There is so much evidence not in the 9/11 report that shows it could not have happened the way the US said..and more and more military officers are acknowledging this. See: Wikileaks is a Fraud US or Zionist or both?

    Building No 7 was admittedly imploded&came down like the other towers&no plane hit it! Despite all that has been uncovered Assange would have us ignore it;that's the effect of following what he says. He is not genuine; he's helping the rulers 'pulling the wool' over our eyes.

    He just pushes it away and tells others to ignore it?
    Yes we should question what is being done 'in our name,.' Re: the germans knew in 1933 when they saw the destruction of Jewish homes and businesses. They could not, not know! But, they were also being terrorized into submission.

  11. well world you got me cornered again. I'm gunna smoke another

  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

  13. hello friend, thank you for writing about this because we each challenge each other's beliefs...and to look at things anew. Before i saw the comment for moderation i was thinking that I had to write more on this issue
    See:'What does Wikileaks do for those who rule & thoughts on twitter.'

    I do believe this is important-which is in the above post

    What you won't find on Wikileaks is daily commentary by them against the war...etc. No. they just have people waiting around for their next dump, or leaks...which they give to the New York Times to decide what is best to be released, and as said before the NY Times has a David Sanger, a member of the Council of Foreign Relations(CFR) decide.

    By the way, that means he sits with Dick Cheney who is also on the CFR. Does not that strike anyone as a little bit to cozy!!!'

    Also see what I said about the 1970s.

    I hope that 'smoke another' is the type that gives you a smile;- I call regular cigs...suicide sticks:- stick to the other ones...all things in moderation.

    Am signing the petition you mentioned on the other site.
    All the Best

  14. it is not Julian Assange or Wikileak... it´s the overall message, we don´t want Jungle Law any more

  15. It's true in that it is not Julian Assange or Wikileaks...per se, but is it/he representing the truth, or part of the machinery that rules. I believe he either is an agent or is being used by one or more agencies. I believe that he could easily be being for interviews with his hairdresser.

  16. If Global society aspires to live in a better world free from the wars and deceitful moves of the vested interests where Governments conduct their affairs in spirit of serving the people it and fairly conducting themselves in all matters of public services, we need millions of Julian Assange in our world today !

    Ashok Sharma

  17. You know that the Commercial planes flying into the trade centers was on live cnn?
    And why would they fly planes into their own Pentagon building?
    Please give me a break.
    I know I am just naive..ha.

  18. I only know that what looked like ´Commercial planes flying into the trade centers was on live cnn?´ appeared on CNN.

    That by itself does not mean anything. For instance, did you know that `BBC REPORTED BUILDING 7 COLLAPSE 20 MINUTES EARLY´

    Twenty minutes early! that shows that they had fore-knowledge. they did it twice, not once and then apologized. No, they reported it twice 20 minutes before it fell!!

    So, the news media were given things to report. have proven conclusively that the government´s story was false on a number of points.

    First, the cabin door on the Pentagon Flight was never opened at all. See:

    Secondly, many pilots have, over the years stated point blank that it would be impossible to fly those commercial jets and EXECUTE those manouvers without the plane coming apart! It´s a matter of physics. See:

    9/11: Speeds Reported For World Trade Center Attack Aircraft Analyzed

    But, if that is not enough see the interview with former Major General Albert "Bert" N. Stubblebine III, head of all intelligence


    General Stubblebine who´s job it was to look at intelligence or other fotos to determine what something was categorically stated that while he was not sure what struck the Pentagon he was certain that it was not a plane. this leaves a couple of possibilities...a drone or a missile strike.

    But, you ask
    ´And why would they fly planes into their own Pentagon building?´ first the missile or drone struck a relatively deserted part of the Pentagon that was convenient. Why not fly into the command centre of the Pentagon from above? that would´ve done the job, and wiped out a lot of the top brass, not to mention deadwood and evil men like Rumsfeld.

    But, to answer you question, the US Government or its intelligence agencies have killed American citizens before. In Operation Northwoods the Pentagon brass in an effort to blame cuba for terrorist acts that they (the Joint Chief of Staff would conceive and authorize) so as to provide a pretext for an invasion of Cuba the JCS suggested killing Astronaut John Glenn and blaming it on Cuba!

    Another proposal was to pay someone in Castro´s government to attack U.S. forces at the Guantanamo naval base, or sink a US warship with crew in Guantanamo Bay. "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."

    That shows that there is no problem with such minor things as killing US troops if it will give an excuse for war" See:

    OPERATION NORTHWOODS.“Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba” (short link-- )

    The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Army Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer was dismissed not long after this.